Just another WordPress weblog

Archive for the ‘Opinions and reflections’ Category

Virgin: Reinforcing brand values by turning wrongs to rights

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Here’s a story that should be of interest to anyone with a company that has ever let down a customer or client. If that’s not you, may I suggest that you’re almost certainly kidding yourself!

Flying on Virgin Atlantic recently, my partner and I were split up due to a difficulty we experienced trying to check in online. By the time we checked in at the airport, there were no seats left next to each other, and despite the ground staff’s best efforts, they couldn’t swap people around to seat us together.

I asked an air stewardess upon boarding the  plane whether she could see if anything could be done to seat us together. About 15 minutes into the flight, she tapped me on the shoulder to say that it was very full and there was nothing she could do for us.

At the same time, she gave me a glass of champagne and some chocolates to say sorry, and asked where my partner was sat so she could do the same for her.

A small gesture can go a long way
Well you can imagine how much better we felt. It was such a small gesture at the cost of no more than a couple of pounds to the company, but it completely changed how we felt about being split up for nine hours, and also about Virgin Atlantic.

Despite the fact that they failed to seat a married couple together who’d booked their flights at the same time, on the same credit card, we had a warm glow – and not just from the glass of bubbly! What’s more, at the end of the flight the same stewardess insisted on giving us a bottle of wine “to enjoy together”.

Good companies nowadays are in the business of selling themselves – their brand – as much as their product. We bought a flight, but came away feeling cared for – which I would suggest is one of the things Virgin want their customers to feel. It’s part of their brand values. They managed this having, at least to our minds, messed up.  Next time we will try harder to book online – and also try to book Virgin Atlantic if we can.

Exceeding the expectations of customers, shareholders, suppliers, clients and staff should be built in to how all companies operate, and this was a great example of a company succeeding in doing this in practice. How does your company do this? Is it skilled at turning wrongs to rights? Looking for ways to improve in this area is a great use of management’s time when you want to stand out from the crowd.

First steps in CMS

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

It’s come to the crunch: Your client – whose project briefs tend to be about as fickle as Paris Hilton choosing shoes for a Friday night party – wants a new website. While not huge, this one feels like it could end up going that way. What do you do?

A – Go for a bespoke method of development because you know there will be changes, adjustments, additional pages and that’s the way you know best, or

B – Install a popular CMS (content management system) and simply configure it and style it?

This scenario faces almost every designer and developer. The option I used to pick was A, mainly for the flexibility and because my CMS knowledge wasn’t the best. Things have changed though and now I feel comfortable routing for option B.

A good CMS is robust, flexible and fast, and it automatically gives you an administration section that you can configure for a beginner to use – thus down the line, if your client decides they want such a feature, it is there ready and waiting.

Learn your CMS before taking the plunge
Knowledge and experience, however, are a must. You need knowledge of the “if something goes wrong, can you fix it?” sort. This is what separates the men from the boys; the last thing you want is something going wrong and that you aren’t equipped to sort out.

Experience with a CMS is vital. You need to go through those difficult stages where those annoying errors are happening or you need to do something specific and it’s like reading the bible backwards in order to achieve your end result.

So while you may be an A-type person now, longing to become a B, from experience I would recommend always ensuring beforehand that you have used your chosen solution in a non-mission critical capacity, and that you have (or are aware of) all the desired plug-ins and custom fixes you’re likely to need to reduce problems.

By Neil Berrow

Why web agencies are really growing to love Wordpress

Monday, September 7th, 2009

Wordpress is currently the most popular blogging CMS (content management system), known for its ease of use and extendibility. Installing takes literally a few seconds and basic configuration takes but a few hours, and then all that’s left to do is style your set up.

This platform is a dream to work with as there is no coding and no real testing. Because Wordpress is so robust and is constantly being developed, what would be the point of trying to creating a blog from scratch?

Wordpress Mu rewrites the rules
But one thing that is really making web agencies take note is the version of Wordpress called “Wordpress Mu”. The “Mu” stands for “multiple user”, and it is used for running multiple blogs. Each user is able to sign up and create a virtual blog; they can configure it themselves and select their own theme.

The major benefit for any web agency or freelance designer is that you can keep all your eggs in one basket. Wordpress Mu allows you to collate as many plugins as you want thus making it even easier to configure a client’s website. It also allows you to monitor, modify, add or delete users all from one dashboard.

Customising… for the masses
If there is a need for a particular type of set up (such as if you build sites for a lot of estate agents, for example) you can create specific “bundles” comprising Wordpress along with a collection of chosen extensions.

There are of course many CMS systems that are out there that have their own unique selling points, but specialising with just one CMS cuts time to a minimum and lowers costs within a project, and Wordpress is certainly gaining fans with features such as this.

By Neil Berrow

Should big companies have an in-house web team or use an external agency?

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Should big companies have an in-house web team or use an external agency? The perceived benefits from upper management of having an in-house team are usually:

  • More control
  • Immediacy of action
  • Less expense

However, as a web agency peopled by staff who have worked both on in-house teams and externally, and with clients big and small, we would argue the following:

  • In-house teams with headstrong management invariably break process despite all good intentions. Process saves time, money and effort and always results in better product at the end. Hence in-house teams often tend to end up costing more for a lower standard of product. “Yes, sir” sites often creak and break early due to just-in-time planning. They undergo lengthy rewrites, alterations etc just to stand still, never mind improving as iterations of sites ought to. Agencies can say “no” for the sake of the end product, and for the sake of their reputation, without risking their livelihoods. Agencies can walk away.
  • Agencies bring a wide range of skills. We, for instance, have skill sets in illustration, web design, web development, web application programming, database modelling, servers and hosting, internet marketing (search engine optimisation, pay-per-click, online lead generation), email marketing, web usability, information architecture and HR. We have spent years building our team. It’s not easy to duplicate this cost-effectively in-house.
  • Agencies only charge you when they are working for you. Over any retainer, you only pay for what you get. Agencies have access to additional resources which they can scale up and down as required. To pay a team and then not carefully utilise that resource is costly. Web work tends to be “bursty”, not busy. This is a major reason why in-house teams are quite unusual.
  • Agencies, in working with multiple clients, tend to bring more fresh ideas to the table, and so generally produce more innovative, forward thinking and ultimately more successful work.
  • Agencies are less hassle. With a good agency, you deal with one person, agree a deadline and wait for the deliverables. For the CEO of the commissioning company, it’s less work.

The answer, we’ve concluded, is down to management style and how stable the workload is. But in 90% of cases, we feel that for the reasons outlined above, it is best to outsource web work to a specialised agency.

New Windows PCs won’t have Internet Explorer preinstalled

Friday, June 12th, 2009

With news that Microsoft will not be shipping new Windows 7 PCs with Internet Explorer (the Microsoft-written browser) preinstalled in Europe, it looks like the “browser wars” are going to hot up.

The reason is that the European Commission has ruled that it is anti-competitive for Microsoft to ship its own browser with the Windows operating system.

Of course, many people don’t even know or care what browser they use – to them, you click on the blue “e” and start using the internet.

Firefox is the browser of choice for many
But to web designers and developers, the curse of Internet Explorer in its earlier incarnations (including the infamously hard-to-write-for IE6) still leaves a bad taste in the mouth, and even the vastly improved IE8 (the current version) is not, it is fair to say, seen as the browser of choice.

That award goes to Firefox. Due to the amazing number of useful “plug ins” that can do all kinds of weird and wonderful things, as well as its fast performance and other advantages, it is giving Internet Explorer a real run for its money, not only among “techies” but the general public too.

A choice of browsers
The European Commission ruling means that many non-technical folk may well get their first taste of Firefox, as they will have a choice of browsers and will be able to download the one they wish to try. No doubt Microsoft will make it easy to download their own, but presumably the European Commission ruling means that they would also have to give easy access to the alternatives to.

Another winner may well be Google, whose Chrome browser – while only currently being used by a tiny minority of people – is well liked and surely must feature heavily in Google’s plans for the future. (Whether a world dominated by Google would be better than one dominated by Microsoft is certainly open to debate.)

Whatever happens, this is a definite blow for Internet Explorer, which was slowly ceding ground to the competition anyway before this ruling and will no doubt now do so even faster, at least in Europe.

Corporate website design: Asking execs the right question

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Corporate websites are the sites that represent a corporation, rather than sites that actually DO what the corporation does. For instance, a “XXX Group of Companies” site may be the “umbrella” site for a few companies that actually do things – “XXX Retail”, “XXX Logistics” etc. These are the sites that have the actual client-facing function (in this case selling things and moving them), not the corporate site itself. So the corporate site is there for… what exactly?

This is the key question to crack for a corporate website design project.  Denied an obvious selling angle, what is it actually for? The only people who can really answer this for you are the top-flying executives, who are in my experience by the nature of their business impatient, quick moving, attention-of-a-gnat type folk who really aren’t at all interested in the minutiae of ANYTHING, let alone their website. But then again, the corporate site is the web equivalent of the boardroom, or the corridor of power – so they will certainly have an opinion on it.

Use your meeting with the execs to your advantage
If you are lucky enough to find yourself getting the chance to speak to the top dogs in a company whose corporate site you’ve been asked to build (and with corporate sites, you may well be), you need to cut through the noise. You know the kind of thing: “We want a map page, and lots of headshots, and we need copy for all the divisions and it can’t have that graphic, it’s rubbish. Use a jumbo jet instead!” and so on.

You need to ask the one question that with corporate websites nobody can really answer well, except those at the very top of the company:

“Who is this site for?”

Once they’re considering your utterly reasonable query, you can nudge things on with a qualifier (after all, you probably have an idea):

“Your customers? The government? Investors? Banks?”

NOW you have them. They wanted this site for a reason, after all.  They will (probably with the same machine gun rapidity) tell you straight:

“No no no, it’s not for investors, it’s for banks, local officials in XXX and XXX, we need it to open doors in the US…”

All of a sudden, you can start to get a rough brief together: We are building a site to present company information to financial institutions and local officials, with a focus on our activities in the US.”

With a purpose, the corporate website design brief comes easy
At this stage, you’re back on familiar ground. You’ll be picturing the site map, the structure. Your web design experience will tell you what will and won’t work, and how the elements should be presented. More to the point, the exec will likely sense that you’re on the same wavelength, and instead of them telling you what they think must be on the site, you can suggest to him or her with the authority you’ve just earned WHAT they should be putting on the site to achieve their goals.

Chances are, they’ll be relieved you know what you’re talking about. It’s one thing less for them to worry about. Happily, it’s now also your chance to prove your ability to someone you might not normally even get access to. The site will be far better for having a purpose, and you were canny enough to find it out from the people right at the top when you had the chance.

Phil Morse